Professor of Mathematics
Paata Ivanisvili
Department of Mathematics, University of California, Irvine
Candidate 30: an old star that dimmed for three winters
Why this estimate. The dimming is certain: ZTF recorded it on two of its detectors and ASAS-SN, a separate network of small telescopes, saw it too. NEOWISE observed the star at the deepest point and saw no change in the infrared, which rules out starspots and a solid body and fits dust. The estimate is held down by the possible companion that Gaia’s measurements hint at, and by the lack of a spectrum.
How to read the pictures. The finder chart shows a patch of sky two arcminutes across, about a fifteenth of the Moon’s width, with north up and east to the left. The star sits between the two yellow ticks, and the white bar is 30 arcseconds long. On a light curve the vertical axis is magnitude, a brightness scale on which larger numbers mean fainter stars, and it is drawn so that down means fainter. Purple shading marks the dimming. Each survey uses slightly different filters, so each is compared with its own normal level. The ZTF pictures show ZTF’s reference image of the star, an image taken during the dimming, and the difference between the two, in which only what changed remains: blue means fainter and red brighter. On the TESS light curves the star is black and the comparison stars are coloured.
What changed. The star is an old subgiant, about 5,500 K, poorer in heavy elements than the Sun and about 11.5 billion years old, a member of the Milky Way’s thick disk some 610 parsecs away in Andromeda. ZTF saw it steady from mid-2018 to late 2024 apart from one smooth dip: 0.04 magnitudes fainter in green light in November 2018, 0.15 in green and 0.08 in red in December, and back within 0.015 magnitudes by February 2019. At the deepest, on 20 December, it had lost 17 per cent of its green light. Smaller dimmings followed in the winters of 2020–21 and 2021–22. ZTF’s alert system flagged it 16 times.
Why it might matter. WISE observed the star from 15 to 19 December 2018, near the deepest point, and saw no change at 3.4 microns, while red light was 0.06 to 0.08 magnitudes faint. Starspots would have dimmed the infrared by about 0.035 magnitudes and a solid body by about 0.07, so both are ruled out, while dust would dim it by only about 0.005. That makes dust the likeliest cause. Gaia’s measurements of the star scatter more than those of a single star (its RUWE is 2.26), which hints at a companion.
No record of the dimming could be found. The star is not in SIMBAD, VSX (the variable-star index), Gaia’s variable-star lists or the other catalogues consulted, nor among the dimming stars of Tzanidakis et al. (2025), and there is no Transient Name Server entry, Gaia alert or paper giving its Gaia number. ZTF’s alert system holds only machine-generated classifications for it.
- Star
- Gaia DR3 2881413844294611968, an old subgiant of the Milky Way’s thick disk
- Location
- RA 358.82898°, Dec +38.76450° (J2000), in Andromeda
- Distance
- about 610 parsecs (2,000 light-years)
- Brightness
- Gaia G = 13.3, far too faint for the eye
- Probability
- This candidate is unconfirmed. The percentage under the title is an estimate of the chance that it is a real, previously unrecorded case of the kind described. The estimate has not been checked by outside experts. See the introduction to all fifty-eight candidates.
- Caveat
- Blue light dimmed about 1.9 times as much as red over the whole dip but only 1.1 to 1.6 times on each ZTF field separately, so the colour on its own is not decisive. Gaia hints at an unseen companion, which could complicate the picture. There is no spectrum.